[Iceberg AddFiles] Remove shardedKey - #39024
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request optimizes the Iceberg AddFiles transformation by removing autosharding during the DataFiles grouping process. By eliminating the dispersion of files across multiple batches, the change reduces the generation of redundant manifest files and streamlines the metadata processing workflow. Highlights
New Features🧠 You can now enable Memory (public preview) to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
|
assign set of reviewers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request simplifies the data file grouping logic in AddFiles.java by removing the use of ShardedKey. Specifically, it changes the grouped files collection from using ShardedKey<Integer> as the key to using a plain Integer key, updating the CreateManifests class and its processing logic accordingly. Additionally, a trivial change was made to the integration test trigger file to run the test suite. There are no review comments to address.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
|
Assigning reviewers: R: @kennknowles added as fallback since no labels match configuration Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
|
LGTM |
|
Failing test is not related, tracked here: #35514 (comment) and #31931 |
Removing unnecessary autosharding from the step that groups DataFiles. We're grouping metadata which can be done using one worker, even at very high throughputs.
Unnecessary autosharding leads to DataFiles getting disperesed across different batches/bundles, which creates more manifest files than necessary.
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>instead.CHANGES.mdwith noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.